Broker-Dealer & Investment Litigation
[Video: Partner Alan Wolper discusses what to consider when involved in arbitration in Puerto Rico.] Whether markets are up or down, investors will sue brokers and banks for losses or insufficient returns. From Massachusetts to California and from Michigan to Texas, it is to the responsive, quick-thinking, and sophisticated attorneys of Ulmer & Berne that many of the nation’s major brokerages, banks, and financial services firms turn to confront and resolve charges of securities fraud, misrepresentation, unauthorized trading, alleged violations of the SEC and financial services regulations, and even criminal violations. These actions run the gamut from complex class actions to individual suits.
Ulmer & Berne attorneys also are pursuing and defending employee raiding disputes, non-solicitation and trade secret matters, and resolving regulatory and compliance issues. Our attorneys routinely represent financial services clients before courts, SEC, FINRA, CFTC, NFA, NYSE, CME, CBOE and in other state and federal forums.
The practice’s clients include JPMorgan Chase & Co., Charles Schwab & Co., KeyCorp, MorganStanley SmithBarney, PNC/Hilliard Lyons, Raymond James Financial, MF Global, and Wells Fargo Advisors.
Clients see the strength of the firm in both its reach across litigation, arbitration, regulatory proceedings and employment matters, and in its size. Ulmer & Berne is large enough to handle any financial services matter anywhere in the nation from its four Midwest and Florida office locations. Many of the group’s members work full time on securities litigation matters. At the same time, we are also right-sized to be efficient and responsive, and to offer our clients a highly competitive rate structure.
Our formula, in short, is to focus on the client, give great service, with first-rate lawyering, responsiveness and efficient staffing — all at a fair price.
We have successfully represented:
- A former managing director of a major New York broker-dealer in a $900 million securities arbitration alleging fraudulent analyst research involving WorldCom; arbitration panel awarded a complete defense verdict.
- A major New York broker-dealer and one of its former managing directors in a $450 million securities fraud arbitration involving a series of allegedly improper hedging transactions in the over-the-counter derivatives markets; obtained a complete defense verdict and expungement.
- A major New York broker-dealer in a $10 million federal jury trial involving alleged securities fraud in connection with complex futures and derivative transactions on both the CME and Globex.
- A hedge fund in connection with a $50 million securities dispute involving residential mortgage-backed securities in a case involving a novel application of Section 11 of the Securities Act to misstatements and omissions in registration documents incorporated by reference into private offering memoranda.
- Several hedge funds in connection with market timing investigations and related civil litigation, avoiding imposition of any fines, penalties or other sanctions by regulators.
- A national securities broker-dealer in defense of a lawsuit brought by an Ohio county to recover $115 million in investment losses from a pooled public investment fund.
- A national futures commission merchant in defense of a lawsuit brought by investors in a commodity pool where the pool operator had plead guilty to criminal fraud; obtained dismissal of complaint.
- Partners in a trading group at the CBOE who were sued in arbitration by their former partners for fraud; obtained complete dismissal.
- A national broker-dealer accused in a nationwide class action complaint of misleading investors in limited partnerships; obtained a dismissal of all charges, affirmed on appeal.
- Major national and international companies in numerous cases involving trade secrets, non-competitive/non-solicitations, inevitable disclosure, raiding and unfair competition issues.
- A national banking institution accused of breach of fiduciary duty under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act for failing to timely invest participants’ contributions to the pension and profit-sharing plan of a major insurance carrier.
- National broker-dealers in non-solicitation, trade secrets and employee raiding cases.
- A national securities broker charged by the NYSE Division of Enforcement with aiding market timing in annuity subaccounts and failing to know his customer; obtained dismissal of charges.
- A national securities broker sued in arbitration at FINRA by a customer for investment losses; obtained a “0” award and then successfully defended the award from attack in the Pennsylvania Supreme Court.
From Ulmer’s Broker-Dealer Law Corner Blog By Michael A. Gross As loyal readers are undoubtedly already aware, I used to work for NASD, and Michael Gross more recently came to Ulmer from FINRA. That hardly means we win every FINRA Enforcement case we are engaged to defend. To suggest that because we...
April 23, 2018
From Ulmer’s Broker-Dealer Law Corner Blog By Alan M. Wolper A couple of years ago, I blogged about the concept of “reverse churning,” i.e., putting a customer who trades only infrequently into a fee-based account, thus costing the customer a lot more than it would have cost that customer to be in a commission-based...
April 13, 2018
From Ulmer’s Broker-Dealer Law Corner Blog By Michael A. Gross I have spoken about FINRA possibly putting an end to the policy of pursuing cases where formal disciplinary action serves little to no regulatory purpose. That welcome paradigm shift may be upon us. This year, FINRA, in essence, pronounced that its “broken...
April 03, 2018
I apologize for not posting anything recently, but, sadly, I was embroiled in a two-week arbitration that occupied most of my recent attention. I am home, however, and back in the saddle. In the meantime, here’s a post from Blaine Doyle, author of the classiest post ever in this blog,...
March 21, 2018
From Ulmer’s Broker-Dealer Law Corner Blog By Alan M. Wolper I have often used this forum to complain about FINRA’s lack of backbone when it comes to dealing with PIABA, the group of lawyers who represent customers of broker-dealers, principally in arbitrations. Over the years, FINRA has amended its rules time and...
March 27, 2018
From Ulmer’s Broker-Dealer Law Corner Blog By Alan M. Wolper Expungement is a funny thing, and here’s why: for years, claimants’ counsel have complained loudly to FINRA that expungement was being granted too frequently, that legitimate customer complaints were disappearing from CRD, resulting in an unfair, sanitized representation of brokers’ records that...
February 16, 2018
From Ulmer’s Broker-Dealer Law Corner Blog By Alan M. Wolper I have used this forum before on occasion to complain about the vagaries of the FINRA arbitration process, and, in particular, the perspective of a respondent’s counsel that the game often seems to be rigged in favor of claimants. Let me give...
February 02, 2018
Here is a really interesting post from Michael Gross regarding those potentially uncomfortable moments when FINRA calls non-complaining customers. Because FINRA is not the government, it has no subpoena power over these people, and so needs them to cooperate voluntarily. The problem is that FINRA does an awful job of...
January 22, 2018
On January 12, 2018, the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to review the constitutionality of the SEC’s appointment of its in-house administrative law judges (“ALJs” for short). As we’ve discussed previously on the blog, a trip to SCOTUS seemed inevitable after the 10th Circuit handed down its decision in Bandimere, concluding that the SEC...
January 16, 2018
I would imagine that the point of FINRA releasing its list of exam priorities each year is to help firms who are actually going to be examined, by providing a glimpse into FINRA’s playbook so they can address, proactively, the issues they know FINRA will focus on. To be forewarned...
January 10, 2018
As I have discussed before, there are some rule violations that are going to happen no matter what FINRA says about them, no matter how many Enforcement cases it brings, and no matter what BDs do to “detect and prevent” such violations. A prime example of such is outside business...
January 05, 2018
From Ulmer’s Broker-Dealer Law Corner Blog By Alan M. Wolper Once again, Rule 8210 has me frustrated. And angry. Well, not the rule itself, but the aggressive manner in which FINRA continues to wield it, and how its scope is interpreted by hearing panels called upon to consider cases involving what seem...
December 20, 2017
From Ulmer’s Broker-Dealer Law Corner Blog By Alan M. Wolper As promised, FINRA has released its first Report outlining common findings from its examinations, in an effort to help member firms comply with the rules and, presumably, avoid problems that other firms encountered. A noble idea, especially for an entity not exactly known (at...
December 15, 2017
From Ulmer’s Broker-Dealer Law Corner Blog By Heidi E. VonderHeide After spending the last few years ferociously denying that there was any constitutional issue with the manner in which SEC Administrative Law Judges (ALJs) were appointed to their position, this morning, the SEC announced that it had “ratified” the prior appointment of each...
December 01, 2017
From Ulmer’s Broker-Dealer Law Corner Blog By Michael A. Gross Michael discusses the differences in examiners — and, potentially — examination results from District Office to District Office. Remember, however, that such differences aren’t supposed to exist! That’s why the Office of Disciplinary Affairs exists. I suppose the question is whether...
December 05, 2017
From Ulmer’s Broker-Dealer Law Corner Blog By Alan M. Wolper A week or so ago, I highlighted in a post the acceptance speech of PIABA’s incoming president, Andrew Stoltmann, in which he announced his intent to wage “war” on the securities industry. Bluster aside, Andrew has been true to his word. His...
November 20, 2017
From Ulmer’s Broker-Dealer Law Corner Blog By Michael A. Gross Here is a post from Michael Gross about a recent settlement involving the submission of false expense reports. The issue isn’t the misconduct, but, rather, the rather tepid sanctions imposed. Do I sense the pendulum starting to swing back? – Alan...
November 17, 2017
An estimated 10,000 Americans turn 65 every day, and this trend is expected to continue for more than a decade. On top of that, Americans are living longer. The average American man or woman reaching age 65 today can expect to live until age 84 or 86, respectively. Legislators and...
November 01, 2017
From Ulmer’s Broker-Dealer Law Corner Blog By Alan M. Wolper It has been said that there’s no such thing as bad publicity, but I wonder if FINRA feels that way after having been featured in a number of less-than-favorable, or at least curious, media stories over the last couple of weeks. First, two...
October 27, 2017
From Ulmer’s Broker-Dealer Law Corner Blog By Alan M. Wolper I have stated more than once in these posts that among claimants’ counsel, I have perhaps the greatest respect for Andrew Stoltmann, a fellow Chicagoan. I am not saying that I ever agree with anything he has to say, because I don’t,...
October 30, 2017
From Ulmer’s Broker-Dealer Law Corner Blog By Alan M. Wolper Bear with me here as I relate the tale of John Saad and his tortuous path through the FINRA Enforcement process and, ultimately, the court system. It is worth following me on this journey, as the upshot of the story is that...
October 23, 2017
Ulmer & Berne LLP announced that financial services litigator, Jonathon D. Drews, has joined the firm as an associate in its growing Chicago office. The addition of Drews, who comes to Ulmer from Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP, reinforces the firm’s highly-ranked Financial Services & Securities Litigation Practice Group. “Over the...
October 16, 2017
From Ulmer’s Broker-Dealer Law Corner Blog By Alan M. Wolper I am on the record, many times, with my belief that, at least in theory, FINRA should never lose any Enforcement cases it files. This is for the simple reason that if FINRA has any genuine doubts about its ability to...
October 13, 2017
From Ulmer’s Broker-Dealer Law Corner Blog By Alan M. Wolper All of you who use Equifax to conduct a part of your CIP responsibilities, raise your hands. Ok, now, only to those of you whose hands are in the air: how many of you have checked your firm’s incident response...
September 29, 2017
From Ulmer’s Broker-Dealer Law Corner Blog By Alan M. Wolper A client of mine bought a BD, thereby requiring him to go through the CMA process. It was a very small firm, with fewer than ten registered reps. He was a newly minted 24, so he had other, more experienced...
September 27, 2017
From Ulmer’s Broker Dealer Law Corner Blog By Alan Wolper Alan Wolper There’s a claimant’s lawyer I’ve litigated against several times who is very good at his job, and who I personally like very much. Part of the reason for his success is that he is very engaging, so even when...
August 07, 2017
Chicago Partner-In-Charge Alan M. Wolper was quoted in a Financial Advisor IQ article focusing on the heightened scrutiny for financial advisors held to a fiduciary standard. DOL Rule Opens More FAs to Negligence Claims From Financial Advisor IQ By Bruce Love Negligence measures the defendant’s conduct versus a standard of care, while fraud measures...
July 07, 2017
Ulmer & Berne LLP is pleased to announce that Cleveland-based associate Candice Capoziello recently became an Associate Board Member for Recovery Resources. Recovery Resources is a Cleveland nonprofit dedicated to providing prevention, intervention, treatment, and supportive services to initiate, manage, and sustain recovery from addiction and mental health challenges. The...
June 27, 2017
From Ulmer’s Broker Dealer Law Corner Blog By Alan Wolper Alan Wolper Not too long ago, I blogged a couple of times about the amount of attention that is suddenly being paid to the number of registered representatives with disciplinary histories working for FINRA member firms, i.e., the so-called recidivists (who...
June 15, 2017
From Ulmer’s Broker Dealer Law Corner Blog By Jennifer Monty Rieker While most of DC was watching the Comey hearing, the House of Representatives passed the Financial CHOICE Act, which would significantly alter the 2010 Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. Dodd-Frank created the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). The...
June 09, 2017
From Ulmer’s Broker Dealer Law Corner Blog By Alan Wolper Outside business activities are in the news. In Reg Notice 17-20, FINRA announced that it was seeking comments in an effort to learn whether or not the existing rules governing OBAs are effective. (The comment period is open until late June,...
June 08, 2017
In a May 25, 2017 decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit affirmed a Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) Opinion and Order dismissing a reparations claim based on statute of limitations grounds. Conway Family Trust v. Commodities Futures Trading Commission, No. 16-3289 (7th Cir. 2017). Notably, the court...
June 07, 2017
Critics say FINRA proposal on unpaid arbitration awards doesn’t go far enough By Mark Schoeff, Jr., published May 22, 2017 FINRA is under fire from critics who believe the regulatory body did not go far enough to address unpaid arbitration awards with recently announced proposals. Alan Wolper, co-chair of Ulmer’s...
May 24, 2017
From Ulmer’s Broker Dealer Law Corner Blog By Alan Wolper On Wednesday, the FINRA Board met and discussed two topics that I recently blogged about: recidivist brokers and unpaid arbitration awards. In predictable fashion, FINRA withered in the face of criticism that its existing rules and policies are somehow not...
May 15, 2017
SEC Disgorgement Could Face Tough Crowd At High Court From Law360 By Carmen Germaine “Of the cases that are up in front of the Supreme Court, with Gorsuch being appointed, this is not one of the more high-profile cases — there’s many cases that have much more profile and wide-sweeping impacts...
April 18, 2017
Ulmer Speaking Engagement Chicago Partner-in-Charge Alan Wolper joins a panel discussion Friday, April 7, during the IA Watch’s Compliance Conference in Washington D.C. Alan’s panel discussion is titled “CCO Liability: An Unvarnished Look at the Risks Along with Realistic Actions to Protect Yourself” and will take a look at personal liability...
April 06, 2017
From Ulmer’s Broker Dealer Law Corner Blog By Alan Wolper There has been a lot of discussion over the past few years, including in this blog, about the growing – and troubling – trend for Chief Compliance Officers to be named as respondents in disciplinary actions. While regulators regularly deny...
March 31, 2017
Ulmer Speaking Engagement Chicago Partner-in-Charge Alan Wolper participated in the ACA Compliance Group’s annual FINRA Hot Topics webcast on Tuesday, March 28. Alan led a discussion about the “areas of significance” outlined in FINRA’s 2017 Regulatory and Examinations Priorities Letter. Topics included potential issues and solutions involving: high-risk brokers senior...
March 29, 2017
From Ulmer’s Broker Dealer Law Corner Blog By Alan Wolper A common complaint that I hear from broker-dealers and investment advisors is that it is nearly impossible anymore to obtain informal guidance from their regulators. Where it was once possible, even normal, to make a call and get casual advice...
March 24, 2017
Broker Theft Allegations Lead to Hundreds of Lifetime Bans Danielle Verbrigghe and Billy Nauman for FundFire, March 13, 2017 “Theft or conversion is at the top of the list of things that FINRA enforcement and other regulatory agencies are looking to stop, says Michael Gross, a partner at Ulmer & Berne,...
March 14, 2017
From Ulmer’s Broker Dealer Law Corner Blog By Alan Wolper I read an article this week bemoaning the fact that “rogue brokers” – a term that is commonly used but steadfastly undefined – apparently remain rampant in the securities industry. Anyone that has read FINRA’s 2017 Exam Priorities Letter knows...
February 09, 2017
From Ulmer’s Broker-Dealer Law Corner Blog Author: Frances Floriano Goins On February 3, 2017, President Trump signed a memorandum addressed to the Secretary of Labor directing that the Conflict of Interest Rule Retirement Investment Advice, 81 Fed. Reg. 20946 (April 8, 2016) (the “DOL Fiduciary Rule” or “Fiduciary Rule”) be...
February 06, 2017
Following a December 27, 2016, appeals court ruling, financial services industry lawyers may have a new defense against the Securities and Exchange Commission’s increased use of administrative proceedings. Alan Wolper, Co-Chair of Ulmer’s Financial Services and Securities Litigation Practice Group, provided commentary about the recent ruling in an S&P Global Market...
January 11, 2017
The U.S. Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) released its 2017 Regulation and Examination Priorities letter on January 5, 2017. Alan Wolper, Co-Chair of Ulmer’s Financial Services Practice, is quoted in an article written for Thomson Reuters’ Regulatory Intelligence that focuses on FINRA’s priorities in 2017. Addressing the fact that FINRA’s priorities letter...
January 09, 2017
Press Release Ulmer & Berne LLP is pleased to announce the promotions of five of its attorneys to partner. They include Daniel Gottesman, Richard Hamilton, Jr., Jesse Lipcius, Brad Sobolewski, and Ulmer’s General Counsel, Kenneth Zirm. In addition, Ulmer also elevated associate Evelyn Holmer to counsel. Lipcius is based in...
January 05, 2017
From Ulmer’s Broker-Dealer Law Corner BlogAuthors: Michael Gross and Alan Wolper I have blogged multiple times, as recently as a couple of weeks ago, about the slew of Enforcement actions that FINRA has brought for an RR’s failure to update his or her Form U-4 in a timely manner to disclose a...
December 19, 2016
Alan Wolper provided commentary in a recent RIABiz article focused on BrokerCheck, FINRA’s report card on broker-dealers. In the article “FINRA shifts an unwelcome spotlight away from itself – by training it on the brokers it oversees,” Wolper noted: “Rather than the entity that was created decades ago, which was...
August 26, 2016
“FINRA Powers Could Shrivel Under New Legal Challenge,” Law360 March 24, 2016
March 24, 2016
“Law360’s FINRA Arbitration Survival Guide,” Law360 February 23, 2016
February 23, 2016
Michael A. Gross, previously Senior Litigation Counsel at the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), has joined Ulmer & Berne as a partner. This marks Mr. Gross’s second tenure at the firm, where he worked as an associate before joining FINRA. Mr. Gross will be based in Boca Raton, Florida, Ulmer &...
May 16, 2016
“SEC Reform of In-House Trials Gets Lukewarm Reception” Compliance Week October 6, 2015
October 06, 2015
“SEC Court To Get Face-Lift, But Attys Still See The Wrinkles” Law360 September 25, 2015
September 25, 2015
“SEC to ‘Modernize’ Administrative Law Judge Rules” Pensions & Investments September 25, 2015
September 25, 2015
“Finra Cracks Down on ‘Cockroach’ Brokers” Investment News September 15, 2015
September 15, 2015
Ulmer & Berne announces that partner Frances Floriano Goins was selected for inclusion in the 2015 Top 250 Women in Litigation, distributed by Benchmark Litigation, and also has been named a Fellow in The Trial Lawyer Honorary Society of The Litigation Counsel of America. Benchmark’s Top 250 Women in Litigation...
August 17, 2015
“Law360 Names Attys Who Moved Up The Firm Ranks in Q2” Law360 July 10, 2015
July 10, 2015
“SEC ALJ Dismisses Action Against Small Adviser Over Form ADV Disclosures” IAWatch June 15, 2015
June 15, 2015
“SEC Administrative Judge Dismisses Conflicts Case Against Robare” BloombergBusiness June 11, 2015
June 11, 2015
“Judge Suggests SEC’s Administrative Cases Unconstitutional” The AmLaw Litigation Daily June 9, 2015
June 09, 2015
“Judge Suggests SEC’s Administrative Cases Unconstitutional” The AmLaw Litigation Daily June 9, 2015
June 09, 2015
“Adviser Gets a Rare Win Over the SEC in Mutual Fund Case” InvestmentNews June 8, 2015
June 08, 2015
“A Rare Setback for SEC in Administrative Proceeding” Law.com June 5, 2015
June 05, 2015
“In Rare Victory, Texas Advisory Firm Slips SEC Admin Suit” Law360 June 5, 2015
June 05, 2015
“Judge Clears Local Financial Firm of Fraud Charges: Judge Dismisses SEC’s Fraid Charges Against Robare Group” Houston Chronicle June 5, 2015
June 05, 2015
“A Rare Setback for SEC in Administrative Proceeding” The National Law Journal June 5, 2015
June 05, 2015
Chicago-based partner Alan Wolper has been named co-chair of Ulmer & Berne’s Financial Services & Securities Litigation Practice Group. Mr. Wolper joins Cleveland-based partner Frances Floriano Goins in leading the group. Mr. Wolper focuses his practice exclusively on the representation of brokers, broker-dealers and investment advisors. He defends regulatory investigations...
May 12, 2015
“Tips To Avoid Trouble When FINRA Makes a Request For Your Records” IAWatch April 30, 2015
April 30, 2015
“Michael Nathan Ungar | Ulmer & Berne LLP” Cleveland Jewish News January 15, 2015 Perennial Super Lawyer Michael Nathan Ungar considers settlement of a dispute embroiling Case Western University among his most memorable cases of 2014. Read the full article »
January 15, 2015
Ulmer & Berne LLP has been ranked within the top 10 percent of all law firms by The BTI Consulting Group, one of the nation’s leading legal industry research firms, in their recently published 2015 BTI Litigation Outlook report. The firm was selected as a “Litigation Powerhouse” and is named...
October 23, 2014
Ulmer & Berne LLP was named 2014 Ohio Firm of the Year by Benchmark Litigation at the second annual Benchmark Litigation US Awards held at the Essex Hotel in New York City on January 29, 2014. The US Benchmark Awards were based on a six-month research period involving extensive interviews...
January 30, 2014
January 2013 – Almost two years ago, I wrote an article discussing FINRA’s seemingly tireless efforts to expand the scope of Rule 8210 beyond the clear bounds as established by the language of the rule itself.1 In particular, the problem on which I focused was FINRA’s increasing use of Rule...
January 20, 2013
- Defended one of the largest investment and trust advisor firms in the United States, its individual investment advisor, and a relationship manager in a FINRA arbitration brought by a customer alleging unsuitable investment recommendations. After obtaining a pre-hearing dismissal of the affiliated bank broker-dealer and several individual respondents, the case proceeded to a three-day hearing which resulted in complete dismissal of all claims against the remaining respondents and a zero award for the customer.
- Defended a national broker-dealer and its branch manager against claims of negligence, breach of contract, and breach of fiduciary duty asserted by the successor trustee of a $200 million trust seeking damages in excess of $6.5 million. After a full hearing on the merits, a panel of three FINRA arbitrators dismissed all claims, issued an order of expungement of the branch manager’s professional record, and ordered the claimant to pay respondents’ attorneys’ fees in the amount of $193,526.84.
- Defended a national broker-dealer (one of many involved in the case) sued in a high profile claim brought by a number of customers seeking hundreds of millions of dollars in damages arising out of a broker’s alleged fraudulent acts. After obtaining partial summary judgment based on the applicable statute of limitations, we proceeded to a 12-day hearing before a panel of NYSE arbitrators which resulted in a complete dismissal of all claims against our client.
- Obtained a directed verdict in favor of a regional broker-dealer and its registered representative at the conclusion of the claimant’s case-in-chief at a FINRA arbitration hearing where the claimant (successor trustee, executor, and beneficiary of the estate of a deceased municipal and corporate bond holder) had asserted claims of negligence, breach of contract, and breach of fiduciary duty.
- Defended a regional broker-dealer and its branch manager against claims of fraud, forgery, unsuitable investment recommendations and unauthorized trading asserted by a customer seeking damages in excess of $5 million.
- Obtained an order from the U. S. District Court holding that many of the claims asserted against a national broker-dealer and its registered representative by the beneficiary of an estate containing various limited partnership interests were ineligible for arbitration pursuant to the FINRA Code of Arbitration Procedure. Defended the remaining claims in FINRA arbitration, resulting in a complete dismissal.
- After successfully defending a national broker-dealer and its registered representative against claims of fraud, negligence, breach of fiduciary duty, and unauthorized trading asserted by a customer, obtained an order from the Court of Common Pleas of Cuyahoga County, Ohio dismissing the customer’s application to vacate the arbitration award.
- Obtained eight separate pre-hearing dismissals of claims brought before FINRA against two national broker-dealers and a registered representative on the grounds that the claims were barred by the applicable statute of limitations and/or were ineligible for arbitration under the FINRA Code of Arbitration Procedure.
- Headed off a lawsuit in excess of $10 million against a national broker-dealer based on claims of conversion (resulting from the criminal acts of a third party) by negotiating a favorable pre-suit settlement.
- Defended a national broker-dealer and its registered representative against claims of negligence, breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, fraud, churning, and failure to supervise, asserted by several customers seeking damages of approximately $500,000 based on alleged trading losses, unauthorized withdrawals, and improper margin borrowing.
- Obtained a directed verdict in favor of a regional broker-dealer at the conclusion of the claimant’s case-in-chief at a FINRA arbitration hearing where the elderly claimant had asserted claims of negligence and failure to supervise based on her investment in technology stocks and unit investment trusts and was seeking damages in excess of $250,000.
- Obtained a pre-hearing dismissal of all claims against a national broker-dealer and two clearing brokers brought in a FINRA arbitration by a customer seeking $100 million in damages based on allegations of fraud and failure to execute.
- Defended a national broker-dealer and its registered representatives against claims of negligence, breach of fiduciary duty, and failure to supervise, asserted by a sophisticated businessman seeking damages in excess of $1 million. After a full hearing on the merits, a panel of three FINRA arbitrators dismissed all claims against all respondents and issued an award of zero for the claimant.
- Successfully defended Investment Advisor in SEC Administrative Proceeding against fraud allegations regarding supposed inadequacy of disclosures in Form ADV and other documents related to compensation and other supposed conflicts of interest. (Coverage in Law360 and National Law Journal)