Mass Tort/Occupational Exposure

Ulmer & Berne’s mass tort/occupational exposure practice has been actively Involved in the defense of innumerable toxic tort claims for 20 years. Because of our thoroughness, timely reporting and outstanding results, our clients – who have been sued due to alleged exposures to a variety of industrial chemicals, sands, lead and asbestos-containing products – have been and remain extremely pleased with our work.

We focus on client contact and use our expertise, aggressiveness and thoroughness to properly handle these types of claims, usually involving various types of lung disease and/or cancer. We litigate on a variety of theories including conventional tort/product liability claims, intentional tort claims and workers’ compensation claims. 

The primary legal allegation or theories in the product liability claims are usually “failure to warn” and/or strict liability. Defenses to these claims include state-of-the-art arguments with respect to the allegedly defective condition of the product itself, and significant issues with respect to causation of the individual condition from which the claimant allegedly suffers. Ulmer & Berne’s mass tort/occupational exposure attorneys have experience in all aspects of these cases and have utilized a variety of safety, medical and epidemiological experts to defend them. We also maintain a good relationship with co-defense counsel and often join efforts on certain issues for both strategic reasons and cost effectiveness.

Attorneys
Steven W. Albert
John M. Alten
Matthew V. Brammer
Joseph A. Castrodale
Paul J. (P.J.) Cosgrove
Timothy M. Fox
Jeffrey G. Geoppinger
Linda S. Glassman
Bari E. Goggins
Sharon E. Gronotte
Jennifer Hageman
John J. Haggerty
Prentiss W. Hallenbeck
Jeanette Hargreaves
Jennifer Snyder Heis
Sherry L. Hesselbein
Elise Balkin Ice
John R. Ipsaro
Mark D. Katz
C. Reynolds Keller
James N. Kline
Camille_Kuri
Murray K. Lenson
Rex A. Littrell
Linda E. Maichl
Bruce P. Mandel
Stephen C. Merriam
Cash H. Mischka
Jeffrey F. Peck
Brian N. Ramm
Gina M. Saelinger
Jeffrey R. Schaefer
Frederic X. (Fritz) Shadley
Jacqueline R. Sheridan
Kurt S. Siegfried
Brad A. Sobolewski
Michael J. Suffern
Mary Lynn Tate
Joseph P. Thomas
Traci L. Wallace
Christine E. Watchorn
Robert E. Zulandt III

 

Clients

 

Representative Experience

Ulmer & Berne has functioned as Ohio counsel and as national counsel for numerous former manufacturers or distributors of asbestos, silica, lead, and other occupational/industrial products.  Currently, the firm represents over 40 companies involved in the asbestos litigation and in the newly emerging silica litigation, in more than 70,000 lawsuits pending in federal and state court.  To date, we have successfully resolved over 20,000 claims.

In Ohio, the firm is responsible for the day-to-day management of thousands of cases that are on the active trial docket.  We routinely obtain summary judgments or voluntary dismissals on behalf of our clients in the vast majority of all cases filed. 

Ulmer & Berne currently serves as national coordinating counsel for eight companies (four in the asbestos, and four in the silica litigation) in thousands of cases filed across the country.

As national counsel, we actively defend asbestos cases in some of the country’s more challenging jurisdictions including West Virginia and Madison County, Illinois.  We have developed and implemented national defense strategies for our clients not only in traditional product liability cases, but also in premise liability cases.  National counsel responsibilities also include developing responses to discovery in all jurisdictions and the review of historical documents as a predicate to preparing discovery answers.  National counsel responsibilities also commonly include supervising local counsel in various jurisdictions and resolving all discovery disputes. 

Ulmer & Berne has also successfully defended direct employee-employer workplace injury claims, otherwise known as intentional tort claims, alleging exposure to various toxins including asbestos, petrochemicals, lead, and silica products. 

Ulmer & Berne has a wide range of experience in defending toxic exposure cases including not only asbestos and silica exposure but also lead paint and lead pigment cases (including class action work); the alleged development of lung cancer through exposure to depleted uranium, arsenic, and chromium; the alleged development of lung disability through exposure to formaldehyde and related resins; and workplace injury claims based upon exposure to industrial solvents. 

With respect to silica, Ulmer & Berne represents a variety of clients including sand distributors, grinding wheel manufacturers, clay distributors, and respiratory protection manufacturers.  We have been asked to participate in the Ohio Silica Defense Core Committee, comprised of a group of attorneys who are the primary force behind the defense of the silica cases in Ohio.  While the silica litigation is relatively new in Ohio, we have already had clients dismissed from numerous claims and obtained summary judgments.  We are also working on obtaining experts versed in the various issues involved in the silica litigation, as we have done for years in the asbestos and lead litigation.

With respect to asbestos litigation, Ulmer & Berne has participated in obtaining summary judgment for two companies in thousands of claims brought in state court on the grounds of preemption by the Boiler Inspection Act.  The grant of summary judgment was affirmed by the Appellate Court and Ohio Supreme Court – the U.S. Supreme Court denied certiorari, which ended the asbestos litigation in Ohio against those two clients.

Ulmer & Berne has also successfully appealed a trial court decision dismissing certain claims without prejudice for failure of service/commencement within the statute of limitations, and obtained, in the Court of Appeals, dismissal with prejudice in over 1,100 claims for our client.

Ulmer & Berne also actively participated in the creation of the reinstatement criteria for the federal asbestos multidistrict (MDL) litigation and successfully argued for the inclusion of a requirement that plaintiffs’ counsel dismiss (peripheral) defendants before the cases can be reinstated and remanded, resulting in considerable savings to the clients.

Finally, Ulmer & Berne serves as liaison counsel between plaintiffs’ attorneys and dozens of defense counsel in over 3,000 asbestos and silica claims.

 

 

Related Practice Areas

Litigation
Product Liability

 

Case Studies

 

Publications
For the Defense
February 2007
"Confidentiality of Settlement Agreements"
Jennifer Snyder Heis, Esq.
Confidentiality of Settlement Agreements

 

News